Flaw in the Reasoning Drill Pack
10 original LSAT-style questions. Work at your own pace. Answer key on the last page.
A study found that towns with more churches have lower crime rates. The mayor concluded that building more churches would reduce crime.
The mayor's reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
- A. ignores the possibility that a third factor, like community cohesion, explains both
- B. attacks the researchers instead of their findings
- C. relies on a study with no control group at all
- D. assumes crime rates can never change
- E. confuses churches with other public buildings
Answer: ______
The coach benched the team's best player, and the team lost. So benching the player caused the loss.
The reasoning is flawed because it
- A. ignores the coach's authority
- B. assumes that because the loss followed the benching, the benching caused it
- C. fails to consider that the player wanted to be benched
- D. attacks the player's character
- E. relies on statistics about other teams
Answer: ______
My uncle smoked for forty years and never got sick, so warnings about smoking must be exaggerated.
The argument commits which of the following errors?
- A. It appeals to an unqualified authority.
- B. It treats one exceptional case as if it refutes a general trend.
- C. It confuses smoking with other habits.
- D. It assumes the uncle is lying.
- E. It uses overly technical language.
Answer: ______
A local newspaper reported that the city's new bike-share program launched in March, and that bike thefts rose 20 percent from March to September. The editorial concluded that the bike-share program caused the rise in thefts.
The reasoning above is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
- A. takes a correlation between two events as proof that one caused the other
- B. attacks the character of the newspaper's editor instead of addressing the claim
- C. confuses a necessary condition with a sufficient condition
- D. draws a general conclusion from a single unrepresentative example
- E. assumes that what is true of a part is true of the whole
Answer: ______
Professor: "My course has a 98 percent pass rate, so it must be one of the easiest courses at the university."
The professor's reasoning is flawed because it
- A. ignores the possibility that the professor is simply an excellent teacher
- B. confuses the professor's opinion with a fact
- C. relies on a survey with too few respondents
- D. assumes that students choose courses based on difficulty
- E. attacks the university's grading policy
Answer: ______
You should buy this brand of running shoes. Three Olympic sprinters wear them, and they are the fastest runners in the world.
The reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism because it
- A. assumes that endorsements by famous athletes prove a product's quality
- B. ignores the price of the shoes
- C. fails to define what "fastest" means
- D. compares sprinters to marathon runners
- E. relies on anonymous sources
Answer: ______
Our rival's software must be insecure. Their CEO was once fined for insider trading, so you cannot trust anything their company makes.
The argument commits which flaw?
- A. It confuses correlation with causation.
- B. It attacks the person instead of addressing the claim about the software.
- C. It draws a conclusion from too small a sample.
- D. It assumes the CEO still works there.
- E. It uses circular reasoning.
Answer: ______
Everyone at the town hall supported the new park, so the whole town must support it.
The reasoning is flawed because it
- A. confuses what the attendees think with what the town thinks
- B. attacks the people who opposed the park
- C. assumes the park will be expensive
- D. ignores the benefits of parks
- E. relies on outdated information
Answer: ______
Drinking coffee must be healthy. My grandfather drank five cups a day and lived to 95.
The flaw in the reasoning is that it
- A. ignores the health effects of caffeine
- B. treats one person's experience as proof of a general claim
- C. assumes the grandfather was healthy
- D. confuses coffee with tea
- E. appeals to the authority of a doctor
Answer: ______
Either we build the new stadium or the team will leave the city. We cannot let the team leave, so we must build the stadium.
The argument is flawed because it
- A. ignores the team's winning record
- B. assumes there are only two options when more may exist
- C. attacks the team's owners
- D. confuses the stadium with the team
- E. relies on a biased poll
Answer: ______
Answer Key
- 1. A — Correlation is not causation. Tight-knit towns may have both more churches and less crime, with neither causing the other.
- 2. B — Sequence is not cause. The team may have lost anyway, or the player may have been benched because they were already playing badly.
- 3. B — One lucky uncle does not overturn population-level evidence. Anecdotes are not data, no matter how vivid.
- 4. A — The editorial sees two trends move together and assumes causation. Warm weather could explain both the launch timing and the theft rise.
- 5. A — A high pass rate could mean easy material, or it could mean great teaching or strong students. The professor jumps to one explanation.
- 6. A — This is an appeal to authority by celebrity. The sprinters may wear the shoes for sponsorship money, not because the shoes are better.
- 7. B — The CEO's past has nothing to do with the software's security. This is a classic ad hominem: attack the person, dodge the issue.
- 8. A — Town hall attendees are a self-selected group, not the whole town. The argument treats a part as if it were the whole.
- 9. B — One long-lived coffee drinker proves nothing about coffee in general. This is hasty generalization from a sample of one.
- 10. B — This is a false dilemma. The team might stay without a new stadium, or the city could renovate the old one. Two options are assumed, not shown.
Keep going: Flaw in the Reasoning sample questions · How to answer flaw in the reasoning questions